FEMAS - Feed Materials Assurance Scheme
Provides an assurance system to ensure that feed ingredients destined for UK livestock meet safety requirements defined by legislators and industry.
Publish date
04 02 2025
Each certified scheme Participant undergoes a rigorous annual independent audit to the feed and food assurance scheme Standards. If these Standards are not met, the Participant will receive non-conformances that must be corrected. Failure to do so will lead to suspension from the Scheme.
Feed incidents and food incidents relating to feed are at very low levels thanks to the due diligence of the feed and food assurance framework. AIC Services works with the enforcement authorities to ensure that any potential feed incidents are contained and any remedial action taken rapidly.
Audits are carried out within the feed and food assurance schemes on supply chain integrity to ensure that these are robust and a true reflection of procurement. This means any incidents can be resolved immediately.
The procurement of safe feed and food materials have never been more important given the current volatile global geopolitical political impacts, climate change and the impact of possible pandemics.
Feeding the nation has never been more challenging, however, the framework for feed and food assurance continues to evolve to meet these challenges.
The UK's feed and food assurance schemes are crucial in upholding the UK's globally renowned food and feed safety standards and ensuring safe feed and food.
These schemes operate at the start of the agri-food supply chain, so ensuring a high level of control at this point is critical.
Given the intricate and extensive nature of supply chains for crops and animal feed - encompassing various global sources, modes of transport, and storage facilities - integrity and confidence are paramount.
Ensuring animal feed safety is vital, as any lapses can compromise the entire food supply chain, ultimately affecting public health.
In the past, mismanagement and fraudulent activities in food and feed safety have led to severe incidents, such as BSE, Foot and Mouth, and Salmonella outbreaks in the early 1990s and 2000s.
To mitigate these risks, feed and food assurance schemes were developed. Today these are indispensable components of livestock and food production in the UK, Europe, and across the globe.
AIC Services manages three trade assurance schemes to ensure rigorous standards and practices are maintained throughout the supply chain.
Feed Materials Assurance Scheme (FEMAS): The leading trade assurance scheme covering all feed ingredients for direct feeding or inclusion in compound feeds and blends. FEMAS is based on HACCP principles, foundational to UK and EU Food and Feed legislation.
Trade Assurance Scheme for Combinable Crops (TASCC): Ensures that crops like grain, oilseeds, and pulses are responsibly treated post-farm. TASCC provides independent verification that the trade complies with food and feed safety laws and covers more than 95% of traded combinable crops.
Universal Feed Assurance Scheme (UFAS): Launched in 1998, UFAS now accounts for more than 95% of commercially produced compound feed in the UK and Ireland, encompassing nearly 1,000 sites.
Animal feed is a vital part of the food chain. Problems with feed can put people at risk. This is why maintaining high animal feed standards is such a crucial part of the FSA’s work to keep consumers protected. Our mission is to ensure people can trust the food they eat is safe, and feed businesses are the very first step in the farm to fork chain.
The FSA’s most recent Annual Report on Food Standards has shown us that the food and feed system has proven extremely resilient, despite the pressure put on global supply chains in recent years.
I was also encouraged to learn from our report that the vast majority of animal feed establishments continue to operate safely. The feed and food assurance schemes (FEMAS, TASCC, and UFAS) that are managed by the Agricultural Industries Confederation are an important part of that resilience. They help to keep standards high and allow resources to be targeted at businesses who are highest risk.
I’m pleased that the FSA has a well-established and strong working relationship with the AIC, which underpins FSA Approved Assurance. We look forward to continuing to work in close collaboration with the AIC to protect public health and ensure that people have food that they can trust.
Professor Susan Jebb OBE,
PhD, FRCP (Hon), FMedSci
Supply chains for crops and animal feed can often be long and complex.
Feed ingredients and other agricultural commodities are sourced globally via traders, which involves multiple modes of transport (ships, rail, lorries) and storage facilities before arriving at feed mills and other processors, to produce food for consumers and feed for livestock.
Animal feed safety is vital for the integrity of the wider food chain as products from farmed livestock are ultimately consumed by members of the public.
Devastating and costly consequences have resulted from mismanagement and fraudulent activity in the area of food and feed safety, as demonstrated by several major incidents in the early 1990s and at the turn of the last millennium, including BSE, Foot and Mouth and Salmonella.
More recently feed incidents have also been associated with the contamination or adulteration of feed ingredients with toxic chemicals such as dioxin and melamine, and again have had devastating and costly consequences for the feed and food sectors.
To assist in combating these risks, feed and food assurance schemes have been developed and have become a vital component of livestock and food production within the UK, Europe and across the globe.
Watch the video below for an overview.
The 2013 horsemeat scandal, commonly known as "Horsegate", was caused by the deliberate mislabelling of horse meat for inclusion in the meat supply chain – a direct result of food fraud.
The National Food Crime Unit (NFCU) is a dedicated law enforcement function of the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and was founded on the recommendation of an independent report commissioned by the Government to examine the causes of "Horsegate".
The Unit provides leadership on food crime across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The unit works closely with the Scottish Food Crime and Incidents Unit within Food Standards Scotland (FSS).
Food crime is defined as serious fraud and related criminality in food supply chains, including activity which impacts drink and animal feed. The NFCU response is determined by assessing the gravity of the fraud.
This will include considerations of the degree of planning and coordination in committing it, the impact of the fraud across geographical regions and boundaries, and the financial loss and other harm to the public and industry.
Examples of food crime include the use of stolen food in the supply chain, unlawful slaughter, diversion of unsafe food, adulteration, substitution or misrepresentation of food, and document fraud.
The FSA issues food - and occasionally feed - recalls concerning a range of issues from mislabelling, and allergen and microbiological contamination.
Go to the FSA website for the latest recall report.
The Feed Materials Assurance Scheme (FEMAS) covers all feed ingredients intended for direct feeding to animals or for inclusion in compound feeds and blends.
It is based on HACCP principles, a system originally pioneered by space agency NASA, but now forming the bedrock of UK and EU Food and Feed legislation.
The Universal Feed Assurance Scheme (UFAS) was launched in 1998 and now accounts for well over 95% of the commercially produced compound feed in the UK and Ireland.
A merchants’ standard was added later to the scheme, and in total UFAS now has almost 1,000 participating sites in the UK and Ireland.
The Trade Assurance Scheme for Combinable Crops (TASCC) was developed because farmers and end users wanted to be sure that crops of grain, oilseeds and pulses were treated responsibly once they left the farm.
This includes wheat processed by flour millers and malting barley for the brewers and distillers in the drinks industry.
The Scheme provides independent verification that the trade meets food and feed safety laws.
Earned Recognition with the Food Standards Agency (FSA) in England and Wales, Food Standards Scotland (FSS), the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA)/FSA Northern Ireland, and the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) for UFAS medicated feed sites is achieved through rigorous compliance with key feed safety legislation.
This recognition confirms that schemes require Participants to meet essential safety standards, supported by robust, transparent, and impartial governance.
For certified Participants, the primary benefit of Earned Recognition is fewer inspections by enforcement officers.
Consistent compliance through certification leads to risk rating adjustments, reducing the frequency of official visits by up to 50%.
The reduction in inspection frequency thanks to Earned Recognition is estimated to save the feed industry more than £3 million each year.
AIC Services maintains recognition of these schemes by submitting monthly, quarterly, and annual data.
They also engage in regular meetings with authorities to ensure ongoing compliance with legislative requirements.
This collaboration provides a legal basis for information sharing in cases of food or feed safety incidents, enhancing industry safety.
The feed assurance schemes are also recognised by major UK farm assurance schemes, including Red Tractor, Scottish Quality Crops, and Quality Meat Scotland.
Additionally, the British Egg Industry Council's Lion Code mandates that farmers purchase feed from certified Participants in FEMAS, TASCC, or UFAS Schemes. These Schemes have a high level of farm coverage throughout the UK.
In the global feed and food industry, the safety of imported ingredients is paramount.
AIC Services evaluates various international feed assurance schemes and establishes "Mutual Recognition" agreements when appropriate safety controls are in place.
These agreements enable AIC Scheme Participants to source ingredients confidently from global suppliers while allowing UK businesses to access international markets.
AIC Services also plays a pivotal role in the International Committee for Road Transport (ICRT), which ensures the safe haulage of goods through regular meetings and the maintenance of the International Database for Transport of Feed (IDTF).
This resource helps hauliers determine the safety of transporting materials and the necessary cleaning procedures.
AIC Services works with several European trade bodies on feed and food safety.
This work has become even more vital following EU-Exit, ensuring that Scheme Participants in Great Britain are kept up to date with the latest European developments, which in turn allows for continued access to the important EU market.
Examples of the trade bodies that we work with are:
"AIC Services plays a crucial role in the grain supply chains, providing a trusted and comprehensive system of whole chain assurance. Red Tractor is proud to collaborate with both AIC and SQC to instil confidence in UK food consumers and deliver enhanced value and options to our grower members. This partnership strengthens the integrity of the food supply chain, from farms to fork, ensuring the highest standards of quality and safety throughout the production process."
The Schemes are managed by AIC Services in conjunction with the working groups, joint development group, and review groups.
The Schemes' requirements have been aligned where applicable to ensure consistent wording of clauses and the desired outcome, which also benefits participants certified to multiple schemes.
Industry representatives sit on working groups for each Scheme which meet three times a year to discuss the Scheme, and the current industry issues, and receive updates from stakeholders and the certification body. The working groups have valuable input into the management of the Schemes, ensuring they remain fit for purpose. Each group has a nominated Chair and Vice Chair, who have years of industry experience, and practical working knowledge of the Scheme and advocate the benefits of ensuring feed and food safety via an assurance scheme.
Representatives from each scheme review clause requirements common to all three schemes to ensure the desired outcome applies to FEMAS, TASCC and UFAS.
The Schemes are reviewed every three years to ensure they meet legal, customer and industry needs. The Standards are written by groups of industry experts from each Scheme within the supply chain who have extensive industry experience. The review groups are made up of representatives from businesses which range in scale and type, reflecting the breadth of views and perspectives on Scheme compliance and practical implementation of the requirements to maintain feed and food safety.
AIC Services and its relevant committees create, regularly review and update the feed and food assurance Standards, and a Certification Body is appointed to manage the Schemes.
Participants of the Schemes are routinely audited for compliance against the Standards and, if successfully completed, receive a certificate of compliance valid for three years.
AIC Services appoints a Certification Body for each Scheme. This is necessary as AIC Services and the Scheme committees are responsible for creating the food and feed assurance Standards.
The Certification Body is Kiwa Agri Food, a role that is contracted via a tender process at regular intervals. Kiwa has a deep knowledge of the Schemes.
It organises and manages the day-to-day operation of the schemes, which includes core interactions with Participants such as booking audits, collecting fees, reviewing action points and their corrective actions.
As a Certification Body, Kiwa must comply with internationally recognised assessment standards such as ISO17065 and are approved to certify the Schemes by the UK Accreditation Service (UKAS).
The accreditation is fundamental in giving our stakeholders complete confidence that there is a reliable interpretation of the food and feed assurance standards. Find out more on the UKAS website.
Collection of data and statistics forms the basis for Steering Groups and Working Groups actions and how the Schemes develop in the future.
Accreditation also supports the Earned Recognition of the Schemes by government departments and relevant authorites.
This government recognition means that Participants are subject to fewer inspections from the relevant authorities.
Auditors are people with experience of the feed and food industry who are trained on how to audit and check how a business meets the requirements detailed in the clauses of the Standards.
Auditor training includes how to deliver and conduct an audit to ensure a full assessment is carried out, communicate effectively with the Participants and a detailed understanding of the requirements of Standards.
Approval to be an auditor is gained through classroom training, shadowing approved auditors and carrying out witnessed audits. Once approval is gained, witnessed audits continue at regular intervals.
Training is key here - shadow audits, internal training, and audits witnessed by UKAS all help to ensure that the food and feed assurance Standard is applied robustly, consistently and without bias for all Participants.
Visit the Kiwa website to find out more about audits.
FEMAS, TASCC, and UFAS Participants and industry stakeholders have a range of ways to keep up to date with the work of the Schemes, including:
"FEMAS has become the leading feed ingredient assurance programme in the UK and Republic of Ireland, with participating companies across multiple supply sectors and around the World. FEMAS is a crucial tool in establishing the ‘due diligence’ required by feed safety regulations; a fact recognised by the granting of ‘earned recognition’ from the UK Food Standards Agency and other UK devolved authorities."
The UK's food and feed assurance sector faces a complex landscape of challenges and opportunities, shaped by recent geo-political changes, evolving regulations, and global trends in sustainability.
The UK’s withdrawal from the European Union has had a profound impact on the UK's food and animal feed assurance systems, particularly due to the evolving legal frameworks across the devolved administrations of Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.
In some cases, the devolved governments are developing their own policies or regulations, resulting in increasing divergencefrom each other and from the EU.
This divergence creates challenges for businesses operating across the UK, as they must navigate multiple, and sometimes conflicting, sets of regulations.
For instance, the EU and GB now operate separate Catalogues and Registers of feed materials. This potentially complicates trade and increases the risks of non-compliance with both regulatory and assurance requirements.
Similarly, there is now considerable divergence between EU and UK Register of feed additives given the asynchronous approval of additives in both jurisdictions and the fact that there is not always common application for approval.
Northern Ireland's position is unique as it remains aligned with certain EU regulations due to the Northern Ireland Protocol, and this adds another layer of complexity. Businesses must ensure that products meet both EU and GB standards, which can be costly and time-consuming.
Phytosanitary certificates have become a major issue for UK exporters since EU Exit. These certificates, which verify that plants and plant products are free from pests and diseases, are now required for exports to the EU.
This requirement has introduced additional administrative burdens and costs for UK businesses in the combinable crops and seed sectors.
The requirement for Export Health certificates for animal feed containing animal by-products has also presented serious challenges to UK feed exports.
In some cases, separate certificates are required for each different animal by-product.
It is not uncommon for a feed to contain two or three animal by-products with the resulting requitement for multiple certificates for a single product or consignment.
Ensuring the safety and quality of food and animal feed requires rigorous testing and sampling procedures. After EU-Exit, the UK has had to establish its own testing regimes, independent of the EU's.
This allows the UK to develop systems tailored to its specific needs but also places pressure on the industry to maintain high standards without the support of EU resources.
The need for consistent, high-quality testing is paramount, especially as the UK seeks to maintain its globally renowned food and feed safety record.
Sustainability is an increasingly important aspect of food and animal feed assurance. Consumers and businesses alike are demanding more sustainable practices, from sourcing to production and distribution.
The UK Government has committed to achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, and the food and feed industries will have to play a crucial role in ensuring this target is met.
Developing more sustainable practices, such as reducing the carbon footprint of animal feed material sourcing, efficient production technologies and enhancing the environmental traceability of products in food supply chains, will not only help meet future regulatory requirements - for instance on deforestation - but will also enhance the reputation, and therefore the saleability of UK products in global markets.
Immediately post-EU Exit, the EU introduced new organic production rules whilst the UK retained the "old" EU regulation.
This presented UK organic operators with immediate divergence issues to manage. The UK is no consulting on new production rules which, though similar to current EU standards, will introduce further divergence.
On one hand, businesses must stay updated on both UK and EU regulations to maintain market access, particularly for exports to the EU.
On the other hand, the UK could tailor its organic standards to better suit domestic needs, potentially fostering innovation and increasing consumer confidence in UK organic products.
However, any significant divergence could make it more difficult for UK animal feed producers and their livestock farming customers to export to the EU, a key market for organic goods.
These past incidents put the health and safety of humans and animals at risk and led to the development of the FEMAS, TASCC, and UFAS trade assurance schemes by AIC Services.
AIC’s Feed & Food Assurance Schemes provide a vital due diligence defence for agri-food supply chains, which ensures feed and food safety.
Watch a summary video below.
"Undesirable substances" in EU legislation on animal nutrition means any substance or product, with the exception of pathogenic agents (for example bacteria and viruses), present in and/or on the product intended for animal feed which presents a potential danger to human health, animal health or the environment.
Some are naturally occurring, while others can be carried over to food from water, air or soil, or created as a by-product of the food production process itself.
Key hazards for animal feed include undesirable substances and other contaminants such as:
Through UFAS, the feed sector carries out compound feed monitoring of dioxin and mycotoxin. Results of the latest survey have been compared with guidance and regulatory limits as stated in EU and UK legislation. Please click below to view the full reports.
An AHDB-led project to monitor mycotoxin in UK grown cereals has been running for more than a decade with reports published annually. This independent work to monitor residues and contaminants in cereals provides food and feed supply chains with confidence upon which these UK industries depend. This project’s data underpins the industry’s reputation for compliance and quality, ensuring that grain produced by UK farmers meets regulatory requirements and can freely enter the supply chain. AIC's interpretation of these results can be found by clicking below.
The "Salmonella in animals and feed in Great Britain 2022" report [PDF] (September 2023) presents the number of Salmonella isolations from livestock and animal feedingstuffs from samples collated in 2022 by the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA).
In 2022, seven ruminant feed isolations were reported, which is significantly lower than in 2021 and 2020, which were 20 and 19 respectively.
A comparison of the serovars isolated from ruminant livestock was not found in the feeds, demonstrating a negligible link between feed and the Salmonella isolations in this livestock group.
There were 14 isolations of Salmonella in compound pig feed, compared with 21 isolations in 2021 and nine isolations in 2020.
There were common serovars isolated in compound pig feed and pigs; S. Derby (two isolations in feed vs 15 in pigs ), S. Kedougou (three isolations in feed vs three in pigs), and S. 4,5,12:I (one isolation in feed vs 23 in pigs).
The low incidence of the serovars found in feed compared to Salmonella in pigs would suggest that other sources of infection are more significant than feed.
In 2022, there were 15 isolations of Salmonella in poultry compound feed. This is a significant reduction from 2021 where there were 24 isolations and in 2020 where there were 37 isolations.
12 different serovars were reported, the most common were S. Agama, S. Kedougou and S. Soerenga (two isolations of each, each accounting for 13.3% of total isolations). S. Soerenga, S. Utah or Salmonella. 6,7:-:enz15 were isolated in feed, but not in poultry.
All of the other serovars isolated in poultry feeds were also isolated in poultry. The report suggests that feed is not the only source of Salmonella infection, but potentially a stronger link than for other species.
Monitoring programmes for poultry, unlike in the case of other animal species, will however detect subclinical infection, which is the usual situation in poultry.
The findings of the UK Food Surveillance System reported by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) are reassuring.
It is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the presence of pesticide residues in animal feed due to the limited data available.
However, the data reviewed for cereal-based food products indicate that, although multiple residues are present, they are generally below the MRL indicating that cereals are unlikely to pose a risk to the animals consuming them.
Fosetyl-Aluminium was detected in six of 84 barley samples tested, but the report concluded there were no food safety issues associated with these residues.
A low level of pesticide residues below MRL in animal products again suggests any residues that may be present in animal feeds are not being passed on to consumers.
Scheme data is collected and reviewed by AIC Services and the scheme committees, including information on Participant numbers per industry sector, numbers of audits completed, numbers of non-conformances raised and the most common non-conformances seen.
All of this information is used to ensure the scheme operates as required, is fulfilling its role in the assurance of the feed/food supply chain and where changes to the Standard or guidance may be required or additional training provided for Participants.
*2023 data
**Total number of certified Participant sites
***621 responses from 2023 survey
Clause ref | Common Non-Conformances |
F1.1Mi | The layout and design of the site, buildings and drains must be such that (a) they are in a good state of repair (b) they are fit for purpose (c) contamination and cross contamination is minimised. |
F1.14Mi | There must be a documented system to ensure all production and storage areas and equipment are effectively cleaned to maintain feed safety. |
F6.12Mi | Bait station locations must be planned to avoid contamination of feeds and bait stations must be secured where appropriate. |
F6.1Mi | There must be an effective pest control system. |
E3.1Mi | Labelling and claims must comply with current legislation. |
Clause ref | Common Non-Conformances |
G9.1b.Mi | All relevant food/feed legislation must be reviewed annually. |
G6.3a.Mi | Training records must be maintained for all relevant personnel |
G21.1.Mi | Internal Audit must be carried out ensuring all relevant activities are covered. |
G6.4.Mi | As a minimum, a designated person must complete the relevant AIC i-learning modules or equivalent training package |
G15.1.Mi | Records of registration under feed must be kept to show that applications have been made and/or responses received from the local council or competent authority |
Clause ref | Common Non-Conformances |
I5.2.Mi | The analysis schedule must as a minimum meet the defined analysis requirement from the FEMAS Calculator, unless a derogation from this level of testing has been agreed with the Certification Body |
G1.15.Mi | To to ensure all production and storage areas and equipment are effectively cleaned to maintain feed safety |
F3.2.Mi | The correct labels must be used and must conform to current legislation. |
G1.1.Mi | The layout and design of the site, buildings and drains must be such that: |
F3.1.Mi | Delivery documents must be clear and unambiguous. All relevant contractual information and information required by regulations, must be included on delivery documents or on labels attached to the product packaging. |
Find information on AIC Services' Trade Assurance Schemes, some of which is restricted to AIC Members and Participants.
Provides an assurance system to ensure that feed ingredients destined for UK livestock meet safety requirements defined by legislators and industry.
Provides an assurance system for the trading of combinable crops for food, feed and biofuel use, the trading of compound feed and feed materials and the transport and storage of combinable crops and animal feeds to meet safety requirements defined by legislators and industry.
Provides an assurance system to ensure that feed destined for UK livestock meets safety requirements defined by legislators and industry.
AIC Members, Participants and non-Members can sign up for the "AIC Principles of HACCP for Agri-Food course Level 2" online training.
The e-learning Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) course is widely used by the industry as training for staff on hazard recognition and implementation of control measures to ensure feed and food safety.
The modular format course is accessible on any device and tracks learner progress so can be fitted around work commitments, taking two to three hours in total to complete.
Kiwa offers a range of Scheme-specific training which can be held remotely or on-site and tailored to your needs. The courses range from half-day Scheme update training to one-day driver CPC for TASCC Participants.
To book your place contact the training team [email protected] or phone 01423 87887.
AIC provides online training modules, based on its Trade Assurance Schemes and tailored to meet the needs of the participants of each scheme.
TASCC Transport Manager: An interactive course covering, management commitment, HACCP, vehicle hygiene, haulage operations, salmonella & allergens and scheme requirements for TASCC
TASCC Driver: A shorter version of the Transport Manager course, focussing on vehicle hygiene, collection & delivery, forbidden materials and specific information for TASCC Drivers
TASCC Storage: This course includes modules on legislation, visitors & contractors, facilities & hygiene, security, and TASCC requirements for stores and storage operations
For further information contact Kiwa Training by emailing [email protected] or find more information on the AIC Academy webpage.
The main objectives for feed advisers within FAR are to provide quality feed advice, consider production efficiency, and reduce environmental emissions in the livestock sector.
Ultimately, the sustainability of the livestock industry is in the feed sector's interest.
The FAR core modules provide training and confirm understanding of whole farm feed planning, nutrition, health, welfare and fertility, environmental policies and issues affecting the livestock sector and understanding how nutrition and feeding management can be used to mitigate environmental impact.
This course provides feed advisers with additional tools to enable them to build on their current knowledge and understanding and broaden their awareness.
Tools are provided via further reading materials and online resources which include links to Government sites, policies and contact numbers.
The register was set up by AIC and the feed sector in response to the Governments’ commitment along with industry and customer demands to reduce emissions from farmed livestock.
As soon as a business joins FEMAS, TASCC, or UFAS Scheme, they have access to support from both AIC Services and Kiwa Agri-Food.
Direct contact can be made with the Scheme managers in both organisations regarding queries on interpretation, how the Standards are applied and general advice on compliance.
Incidents and concerns should also be reported as described in the Scheme Rules. Guidance and information on Schemes can be found on the Trade Assurance Schemes webpages.
All Schemes provide checklists which can be used for internal auditing and can be downloaded by page or section as required.
In addition, FEMAS has Sector Notes which provide guidance and additional requirements for FEMAS Participants processing former foodstuffs for use in animal feed. The range of topics covers products, processes and gatekeeping.
UFAS has an activity classification tool and guidance on sampling and testing. TASCC has a range of templates and forms which can be adapted by the participant to suit their needs.
Newsletters are issued twice a year for each Scheme covering topical issues and informing Participants of what is happening within the Scheme and relevant legislation changes.
Recently updated to have the most recent certification status information from Kiwa, the Checker provides the current certification status of any participant in the trade assurance schemes. With free public access, it is searchable by company name, address and postcode and filterable by scheme and certification status.
The AIC Services Trade Assurance Consultant Register has been developed to support participants of AIC Trade Assurance Schemes. It provides information on sources of professional advice related to our schemes.
The Portal is a useful way for Participants to view their audit reports, update non-conformance actions, and upload documents relevant to their Scheme compliance and access their i-learning modules.
Uploading documents in advance of an audit helps to maximise the usefulness of audit time on site which benefits both the Participant and the auditor.
This portal is managed by Kiwa. If you have any issues logging into this portal please either use the forgotten password links on the portal page or contact Kiwa directly by calling 01423 878873.
The feed and food assurance Schemes FEMAS, TASCC and UFAS have a long history of developing in line with new market requirements and will do so even more as we look to the future.
As ever, global events will impact these vital Schemes - this includes the geo-political but also new sources of supply, as well as the effects of climate change on feed materials.
Closer to home, AIC Services will maintain its constructive work with the UK Government to develop the Schemes in line with feed and food safety policies.
Other opportunities and challenges to be managed will revolve around how assurance is implemented across the four UK nations, and the ongoing ramifications of the UK's withdrawal from the European Union.
AIC Services is constantly scanning the horizon and works with all relevant stakeholders to ensure all these factors are fully considered.
All Schemes work with the industry via industry-based committees to ensure that they meet robust technical requirements.
The industry has a wealth of leading experts in these fields which helps FEMAS, TASCC and UFAS remain fit for purpose.
More recently the Standards of these three Schemes have been more closely aligned, aiding even better understanding among Participant businesses.
The value of earned recognition with the UK Government has been upheld for all three Schemes, and this looks set to continue thanks to the recent signing of a new Memorandum of Understanding.
Ensuring an integrated approach to assurance and enforcement is vital to avoid duplication and cost.
AIC Services also works with EU Trade Bodies and also has mutual recognition with a range of EU Schemes.
This helps to ensure that trade between the UK and EU is unhindered and provides and deep cultural understanding of how assurance works in our trading partners.
As well as the Standards, auditing will be developed in line with technological advancements.
A range of audits now exist including on-site, remote, and hybrid - this allows for flexibility both for the Participant and the Scheme's auditing body.
Technology has also been applied in the areas of online portal development to make data provision and exchange easier and more transparent, and this work will advance over the coming years.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) will likely bring major change, and we will maintain our work with audited supply chain businesses and certification bodies to make the best use of this technology.
In conclusion, the AIC Services feed and food trade assurance Schemes will continue to develop with the Government and our stakeholders' requirements with strong support from the industry.
External events and the application of technology will be key areas of development both now and in the future.
“These essential Trade Assurance Schemes have developed over many years and underpin the safe supply of feed and food for the consumers and livestock industry. With out these Schemes there would be a higher level of feed and food incidents, product withdrawals and a lack of confidence in the UK agri-food supply chain. The industry has worked hard in developing and supported the AIC Trade Assurance Schemes and these look set to continually develop to meet the changing needs of the UK consumer and Government requirements. New technology application will play a big part in this with the development of IT systems and AI both now and in the future.”